Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 137-142, November 2011

Midwives at youth clinics attitude to HPV vaccination and their role in cervical cancer prevention

  • Marie G. Oscarsson

      Affiliations

    • School of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden
    • Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: School of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health, Social Work and Behavioural Sciences, Linnaeus University, SE-391 82 Kalmar, Sweden. Tel.: +46 480 44 60 80; fax: +46 480 44 69 55.
  • ,
  • Annica Dahlberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
  • ,
  • Tanja Tydén

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden

Received 24 May 2011; received in revised form 11 August 2011; accepted 23 September 2011.

Abstract 

Objective

To explore youth clinic midwives role in cervical cancer prevention and their attitude to HPV vaccination.

Study design

Individual interviews with 13 midwives working at youth clinics in Sweden. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed by qualitative content analysis.

Results

Three themes were identified in the qualitative content analysis: “Cervical cancer prevention not a prioritised area”, “Ambivalence to the HPV vaccine”, andGender and socioeconomic controversies”. Few midwives talked spontaneously about cervical cancer prevention. The responsibility for providing information about HPV vaccination was considered as primarily that of school health nurses and parents. Midwives were positive about the HPV vaccination, but recognised certain risks, such as its potential negative impact on cervical cancer screening and increased sexual risk taking. The midwives expressed concerns with medical risks, such as side effects and unknown long-term effects of the HPV vaccine. The midwives in the study had ethical concerns that boys were not included in the program and not all families had the financial resources to vaccinate their children. Thus, weak socioeconomic groups might be excluded.

Conclusion

The midwives considered cervical cancer prevention as important, but did not integrate information on the HPV vaccine into their routine work, mainly because young people visiting youth clinics had had their sexual debut and they were concerned about the medical risks and that the vaccine was too expensive.

Keywords: Human papillomavirus, Cervical cancer, Vaccination, Mass screening, Midwives, Prevention

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1877-5756(11)00032-2

doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2011.09.001

Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 137-142, November 2011